Epstein Secrets

ears' old. On March 11, 2004, called at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,

to the girls whom she recruited. Slieksaid that she told Epstein that she was 1 at "he knew better." a also said that she was never instructed by Mt Epstein or to make sure that the girls that she brought were over 18 and was never asked to provide identification/proof of her age for herself or for any

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury, the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the d

Circuit has ruled that evidence of the use of a telethone satisfies the element of using a facility or means of interstate commerce. United States.. Drury, 396 F.3d 1303, 1311 (11th Cir. 2005) (the term "facility of interstate commerce ... establishes federal jurisdiction whenever any "facility of int

d. On March 11, 2004, JD#1 called Tony at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

hone call was between states) or purely intrastate in nature ( i.e. , the telephone call was made to another telephone within the same state)."). In Drury , the defendant used his land-line telephone to call an undercover agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Ge

ver had no contact whatsoever with Mr. massages, but the p or coerce. See e.g., close in a sexual way Ms. guy." the phon with Ms. Id. at 10. Ms Epstein over the Internet or phone; and was neve the phone or Internet. Id. at 24-25. In fact, Ms. Epstein or any of his employees prior to arriving at pst

if it intends to pre-empt the historic powers of the itates') (quoting Rice' Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218 (1947)); see also United States Drury, 344 F.3d 1089, 1101 (11th Cir. 2003) (recognizing that in the absence of "unmistakably clear" language signaling Congress's intent to alter the fe

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

a.m. At 3:38 that afternoon, called Tony at 9:13 M. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 On March 11, 2004

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

d. On March 11, 2004, JD#5 called Tony at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

4. On March 11, 2004, JD#1 called Tony at 9:13 p.m. Epstein arrived the same day, at 11:20 p.m. On March 12,