Epstein Secrets

shed light on that. 2 finest and largest law firma here in Florida are 3 MR. CASSELL: Well, it may be, for example -- ) currently representing Mt. Epstein, so they 4 THE COURT: I don't want to go on a fishing i certainly have the reeources to search -- to 5 expedition, as you can appreciate. I do

of what Was going on in bankruptcy • I was a personal participant with the lawyers for a court, connunicaced co Judge Carney, • This subpoena 1 Conrad Scherer, and an agreement was reached with 10 was issued in my case. While I respect you and the 10 the 'aware for Conrad Scherer because, as we have It

Did the Special Magistrate Carney a Scherer tiro was involved in chat litigation, and 3 or Judge Ray over hold a hearing to deternine Che a the Conrad Scherer firm wag alto interested in 4 nature of the privilege? Was that over called up 0 getting to take a look at whatever relevant e -nails 5 for a he

shed light on that. 2 finest and largest law firma here in Florida are 3 MR. CASSELL: Well, it may be, for example -- ) currently representing Mt. Epstein, so they 4 THE COURT: I don't want to go on a fishing i certainly have the reeources to search -- to 5 expedition, as you can appreciate. I do

of what Was going on in bankruptcy • I was a personal participant with the lawyers for a court, connunicaced co Judge Carney, • This subpoena 1 Conrad Scherer, and an agreement was reached with 10 was issued in my case. While I respect you and the 10 the 'aware for Conrad Scherer because, as we have It

Did the Special Magistrate Carney a Scherer tiro was involved in chat litigation, and 3 or Judge Ray over hold a hearing to deternine Che a the Conrad Scherer firm wag alto interested in 4 nature of the privilege? Was that over called up 0 getting to take a look at whatever relevant e -nails 5 for a he

en Edwards and various members of the press. 17 R. 814, citing privilege log of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman. R. 815, citing M. v. Epstein, 09-81092 Marra/Johnson, deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 23, line 4; p. 38, line 22. 19 R. 815, citing Jane Doe v. Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Jo

tigations into over one-half of the attorneys employed by RRA. At or about the same time in November 2009, I also became aware that the law firm of Conrad Scherer filed a Complaint against Scott Rothstein and others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereina