Epstein Secrets

otations from communications over which attorney-client privilege and other protections had been repeatedly asserted, by Farmer Jaffe, Edwards, and L.M. Epstein also provided a wholly out-of- context and substantially misleading summary of what he believed the emails demonstrated. In subsequent filings in co

sor to Judge Crow). As it has evolved, Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards was dismissed and the lawsuit now 3 Specifically, on April 10, 2012, Judge David F. Crow (presiding over the Epstein lawsuit) entered an Order requiring Edwards to produce any non-privileged documents identified in paragraph 13 of Epste

who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other donations; Leslie Wexner, a. client of the Plaintiff; (e) Taking the deposition of Mark Epstein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not asking any questions about Edwards' clients; Edwards targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The P

avid Copperfield (illusionist); (d) Individuals who had knowledge of Epstein's charitable, political or other donations. Taking the deposition of Mark Epstein, brother of the Plaintiff, but not asking any questions about Edwards' clients; Edwards targeted the foregoing individuals because they were close

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The P