Epstein Secrets

ice list below. RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, PLLC By: /s/ Chad P. Pugatch CHAD P. PUGATCH (

19/18 Page 69 of 97 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Whic

ice list below. RICE PUGATCH ROBINSON STORFER & COHEN, PLLC By: CHAD P. PUGATCH (FBN I - AND - I he

PA ("Link & Rockenbach"), which occurred on October 13, 2018. Due to the impermissible questions, Epstein additionally moves this Court to require Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe"), Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") and Intervenor L.M. ("L.M.") (collectively, the "Movants

P. Pugatch, Esq. Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen, PLLC 11 EFTA00793509 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc

2/18 Page 73 of 165 60 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Whic

rida. I am currently a partner in the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe. Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. > 2.

Epstein took voluntary dismissal of his claims because he knew he did not have probable cause or an evidentiary basis to support the allegations. See Cohen v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 1153 at 1156 (citing Union Oil of California, Amsco Division v. Watson, 468 So. 2d 349 at 354 (stating that “where a dismissal