Epstein Secrets

SKY MARK IN 0 50434310050000010 691 N COUNTY RD COHEN ROBERT B & 0 1260000 36287454 36287454 36287454

parcels PCN SITEADDR OWNERNAME1 OWNERNAME2 EXEMPTION PRICE ASSESSVAL TOTALVALUE TOTTAXVAL TOTALBILL PADDR1 PADDR2 PADDR3 CITYNAME STATE STREET_NUM PRE_DIR STREETNAME STREET_SUF POST_DIR ZIP1 ZIP2 MUNI SUBDIVNAM ACRES 30434116040180000 401 SOUTH SEAS DR OCEAN AT THE BLUFFS SOUTH CONDO ASSN INC 0 100 0 0 0 $0 SOUTH SEAS DR 33477 1128 JUPITER OCEAN AT THE BLUFFS SOUTH 0.69 50434234010000011 INDIAN RD PRUDDEN JEFFREY P 0 100 3803800 3803800 3803800 $608,608 INDIAN RD 10033 1755

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein’s required complian

served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit “BB.” Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluctant to give her deposition, and

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, Vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, / DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradiey J. Edwards, by and thr

Epstein took voluntary dismissal of his claims because he knew he did not have probable cause or an evidentiary basis to support the allegations. See Cohen v. Corwin, 980 So. 2d 1153 at 1156 (citing Union Oil of California, Amsco Division v. Watson, 468 So. 2d 349 at 354 (stating that “where a dismissal

Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2018-08-23\i Ps on 2018-08-17 at 11.53.05.ichat Service: iMessag Start Time: 08/17/18 08:53:05 AM (556213985) End Time: 08/23/18 03:07:01 PM (556754821) Last Message ID: 19138 Chat Room: Participants: jee, [iy Presentity IDs: e:[email protected], Messages - Sender: e:[email protected] Time: 08/17/18 08:53:05 AM (556213985) Flags: 1085445 Is Read: No Is Invitation: No r, GUID: 87838E9F-C372-4612-80EE-B8A4327BA691

mail.com Time: 08/21/18 11:38:00 AM (556569480) Flags: 1085445 Is Read: No Is Invitation: No GUID: 63BB7CC2-812C-4188-B63F-BCB37CBA7C03 Message: Cohen s arrest bad sender: Time: 08/21/18 11:43:11 AM (556569791) Flags: 1060865 Is Read: Yes Is Invitation: No GUID: F913CB57-850B-4D81-A7D4-9D27BOFD