Epstein Secrets

16 Civ. 2372 (KPF) (JLC), 2016 WL 6804999 (S.D.N Y. Nov. 17, 2016) 8 United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044 (2d Cir. 1995) 5, 6 United States v. Cohen, 18 Cr. 602 (WHP), 2019 WL 472577 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2019) 8 United States v. Silver, No. 15 Cr. 93 (VEC), 2016 WL 1572993 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2016

nsiderations recently motivated Judge Pauley to order the redaction of the names of non-parties from warrant materials filed in connection with the Michael Cohen case. See United States v. Cohen, 18 Cr. 602 (WHP), 2019 WL 472577, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2019) ("[R]eferences to those around Cohen from which t

7 Gardner v. Newsday, Inc., 895 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1990) 5 In re New York Times Co., 828 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1987) 4, 5, 8 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) 4 Miller v. City of Ithaca, No. 10 Civ. 597 (TJM), 2013 WL 12310711 (N.D.N.Y. May 8, 2013) 6 Nixon v. Warner Commc

ON. M R AN & FOREMAN P.C. Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of

a "judicial document" and would enjoy no presumption of public access."). The Second Circuit established a framework in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) for courts to utilize in determining when the public has a right of access to particular documents. The Court of Appeal

, 2008) 55 John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146 (1989) 52 Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614 (1973) 51 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) 54 Mazzeo v. Gibbons, No. 2:08-CV-01387-RLH-PA, 2010 WL 3910072 (D. Nev. Sept. 30, 2010) 53 iv EFTA00155904 McDo

e noted that "the FBI investigated this matter." Crypto Rapper 'Razzlekhan,' Husband Reach Plea Deal Over Bitfinex Hack Laundering Reuters (07/21, Cohen) reported that an American couple accused of laundering billions of dollars worth of cryptocurrency stolen from the 2016 hacking of virtual currency

may have known some Oneida Nation members, was gang-raped and killed. The article stated that FBI agents reportedly made visits to residents of the Onondaga reservation, a bigger Native American territory 40 miles from the Oneida Nation Territory, as recently as last week in their latest efforts to pers

essercom autodocket@cohengressercom Mark Stewart Cohen mcohen@cohengressercom Mark-Cohen[email protected]

2, 2021, and to justify any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/21)(jw) 1:20-cr-00330-AJN-1 Notice has been electronically mailed to: EFTA

OG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdd

al if "countervailing factors" in the common law framework or "higher values" in the First Amendment framework so demand. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006); see also Unites States v. Wey, 256 F. Supp. 3d 355, 411 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (Nathan, J.) (granting motion to seal evi

OG COHEN & GRESSER LLP Mark S. Cohen Christian R Everdel

al if "countervailing factors" in the common law framework or "higher values" in the First Amendment framework so demand. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006); see also Unites States v. Wey, 256 F. Supp. 3d 355, 411 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (Nathan, J.) (granting motion to seal evi