5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & S
202 (1986). Summary judgment is inappropriate if, resolving all ambiguities and drawing all inferences against the moving party, id. at 255 (citing Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 158-59, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970)), there exists a EFTA00204762 dispute about a material fact "such
ally, the district court's order is not immediately appealable [FINS] under the "collateral order" exception to the final judgment rule set forth in Cohen rig v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546-47. 93 L. Ed. 1528. 69 S. Ct. 1221 (1949). Under Cohen, an interlocutory order is immediatel
mmary judgment in the district court, we treat the evidence presented to the district court in the light most favorable to the nonmovart plaintiffs. Adickes v. S.H. Kress 8 Co., 398 U.S. 144. 157.90 S. Ct. 1598. 1608.26 L Ed. 2d 142 (1970); Thrasher v. Slate Pam; Fire B Casualty Co.. 734 F.2d 637. 638 (
EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & S
202 (1986). Summary judgment is inappropriate if, resolving all ambiguities and drawing all inferences against the moving party, id. at 255 (citing Adickes I S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 158-59, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970)), there exists a dispute about a material fact "such that a reasonabl
dorsement on letter to Judge Chin from Ellen Yaroshefsky dated 10/8/98; counsel for Den Cohen requests that the Court permit the adjournment of Ms. Cohen's deposition beyond the current discovery cutoff date. I have reviewed this letter; the Govt's letter of today; and Ms. Yarostefsky's 2d letter of
ary judgment is inappropriate if, resolving all ambiguities and drawing all inferences against the moving party,id. at 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (citing Adickes I S.H. Kress & Ca, 398 U.S. 144, 158-59, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970)), there exists a dispute about a material fact "such that a reasona
EPSTEIN, Ivan S. Fisher, Ellyn Bank, Debra Elisa Cohen, Diane Fisher d/b/a the Fisher Group, Fisher & S
202 (1986). Summary judgment is inappropriate if, resolving all ambiguities and drawing all inferences against the moving party, id. at 255 (citing Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 158-59, 90 S.Ct. 1598, 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970)), there exists a dispute about a material fact "such that a reasona
Entities connected to both Michael Cohen and Adickes

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Barry Diller
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Lawrence Krauss
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Richard Kahn
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Martha Stewart
PERSON
Oregon
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Bill Richardson
PERSON
Anderson
PERSON