Epstein Secrets

sted by Epstein and Maxwell together. In light of this and other information, Edwards served her for deposition in 2009. Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

ed States, 359 F.Supp.2d 981, 984 (E.D. Cal. 2005). An evidentiary hearing is the proper vehicle for resolving this particular factual dispute. See Blair v. City of Worcester, 522 F.3d 105, 115 (1st Cir. 2008) (reversing district court for refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing where factual issues s

Fifth Avenue, Suite 3100 New York, NY 10118 19. Ross Gow (video) 15 EFTA00792770 Acuity Representation 23 Berkeley Square London W1J 6HE 20. Brett Jaffe (live) Alston & Bird, LLP, NY 90 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 21. Robert Hanson (live) 22. (live) do Philip Barden Devonshires Solicitors L

tiff did not dispute—and thereby confessed—that this statement is not actionable. Accordingly, we assume this statement is not in issue at trial. 2 Blair v. Inside Ed. Prods., 7 F. Supp. 3d 348, 358 & n.6 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (citing DiBella v. Hopkins, 403 F.3d 102, 111 (2d Cir. 2005)). 8 EFTA00792763

W. Es lin, Ed.D. live) 17. Anthony Figueroa (video) 18. Louis Freeh (live) SE 19. Ross Gow (video) 15 EFTA00617410 Acuit Re resentation 20. Brett Jaffe (live) Alston & Bird, LLP, NY 90 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 21. Robert Hanson (live) 23. Brittany Henderson (video) 24. Peter Kent live 25

tiff did not dispute—and thereby confessed—that this statement is not actionable. Accordingly, we assume this statement is not in issue at trial. 2 Blair v. Inside Ed. Prods., 7 F. Supp. 3d 348, 358 & n.6 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (citing DiBella v. Hopkins, 403 F.3d 102, 111 (2d Cir. 2005)). 8 EFTA00617403