Epstein Secrets

his and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit "." Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

robative in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶21. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00726030 have run a

is and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit "BB." Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Gresser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and Edwards's settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 121. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00081213 Case 9:08-

is and other information, Edwards served Maxwell for deposition in 2009. See Deposition Notice attached as Exhibit "BB." Maxwell was represented by Brett Jaffe of the New York firm of Cohen and Greaser, and Edwards understood that her attorney was paid for (directly or indirectly) by Epstein. She was reluct

in discrediting any causal relationship between the Ponzi scheme and Edwards's settlement negotiations. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 121. Edwards Non-Involvement in Fraud by Scott Rothstein 86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to 32 EFTA00188897 Case 9:08-