Epstein Secrets

Reinhart in later representing Epstein-related entities. Because the Government's (inadequate) privilege log does not reveal which entries relate to Reinhart, it is not possible to point the Court to the specific documents that demonstrate this misconduct. These documents, however, are covered by the cri

Answers to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions (RFA's), fl 15-17.4 It further admitted that OPR collected information about Reinhart's possibly improper behavior. See Gov't's Answers to RFA's, ¶ 22(a). Yet them is no way to tell which documents (among the more than 13,000 pages o

neys, and First Assistant U.S. Attorney Benjamin Greenberg, "regarding Formal Notice of Office-wide Recusal

he victims have sought documents showing that Reinhart learned confidential, non- public information about Epstein matter. The Court will recall that Reinhart has filed a sworn affidavit with this Court, in which he flatly declared that while he was a prosecutor in the Office: "I never learned any confide

ein, blocking his prosecution for federal crimes in the Southern Districdt of Florida. In RFP No. 16, the victims have sought documents showing that Reinhart learned confidential, non- public information about Epstein matter. The Court will recall that Reinhart has filed a sworn affidavit with this Court,

ffice for United States Attorneys, and Benjamin Greenberg, First Assistant U.S. Attorney, Southern Distric

making such decisions about the course of the criminal investigation. Within months after the non-prosecution agreement was signed by your office, Reinhart left your office and Immediately went into private practice as a white collar criminal defense attorney. His office coincidentally happened to be n

s Attorney Wifredo A. Ferrer, First Assistant Ben Greenberg, Marie Villafana, and I, met with Cassell, Edwar