Epstein Secrets

court record in their cases, included admissions band Thomas that they falsely certified that they had

35990 --- PAGE BREAK --- Limited Official Use Only—Not for Public Release On November 19, 2019, a federal grand ry of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York returned an indictment that chargennd Thomas with one count each of conspiracy and multiple counts each of falsification of records, in violation o

y 2005, the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern _ District of Florida learned of Epstein’s repeated sexual a

-- whatsoever” with the litigation in this case. See, e.g., Journal, Exhibit F, at 85 (Donald Trump); at 9 (Bill Clinton phone numbers listed under “Doug Bands”). ‘E ederal Investigation and Plea Agreement With Epstein 19. In approximately 2005, the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern _ Distr

for him, including those for his assistant (Doug Band), his schedulers, and what appear to be Clinton’s

agreed that he would not contest jurisdiction in the Southern District of Florida for any victim who chose to sue him fo

-- whatsoever” with the litigation in this case. See, e.g., Journal, Exhibit F, at 85 (Donald Trump); at 9 (Bill Clinton phone numbers listed under “Doug Bands”). | | Federal Investigation and Plea Agreement With Epstein 19. In approximately 2005, the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern . Dis

for him, including those for his assistant (Doug Band), his schedulers, and what appear to be Clinton’s

pstein, case number 08-80893 in: federal Court in the Southern District of Florida. | am the lead attorney representing °

iend; (d) the flight logs for the relevant years 2002 - 2005 showed Clinton traveling on Epstein’s plane on more than 10 occasions and his assistant, Doug Band, traveled on many more occasions; (e) Jane Doe No. 102 stated generally that she was required by Epstein to be sexually — HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013471 --

on more than 10 occasions and his assistant, Doug Band, traveled on many more occasions; (e) Jane Doe No

r claims against these financial sponsors of terrorism. Statement Of Subject Matter and Appellate Jurisdiction The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had subject matter jurisdiction over these actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1330, 1331, 1332, 1350, 1367, 1407, and 1605, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964 and 2338,

t decision as a result of this Circuit’s “mini-en band” process. Because those dismissals were based on

rorist activities and to be affiliated with al-Qaeda. See Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d at 647-48; see also Goldberg v. UBS AG, 660 F. Supp. 2d 410, 428-29 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) (finding that plaintiffs had “sufficiently pled that the defendant consciously disregarded the fact that it was supporting a terrorist organiza