Epstein Secrets

r the Duke of York to be introduced to "pretty" girls for, as the defendant called it, "2 legged sight seeing." In another email, the defendant told Doug Band that she was arranging a dinner for him and a' and a' ." We are producing these proposed ex its to ay, mart with the ex, numbers: GX 401 throu

eeing." In another email, the defendant told Doug Band that she was arranging a dinner for him and a'

07 October 11, 2021 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Christian Everdell, Esq. Cohen & Gresser LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East Tenth Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Bobbi Stemheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19t

ew York, NY 10022 Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. 150 East

e allegations of others and decided to hop on the band wagon. She then made up similar claims for the p

XWELL, Defendant. X 15-cv-07433-RWS DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXCEED PRESUMPTIVE TEN DEPOSITION LIMIT Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. EFTA00097395 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 2 of 11 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms.

DEPOSITION LIMIT Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. EFTA00097395

HANA Silty ais sie neg epeu afd yueg juawjsesu) BAND ‘28}S]U em ies SENT RNAS x Ag 8 — gy oO S z

ment is being served to all parties of record via transmission of the Electronic Court Filing System generated by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Sigrid S. ne HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014121 EXHIBIT 1 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_0

ted by CM/ECF. Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the internet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) beca

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the intemet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) becau

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the intemet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) becau

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo

erest in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the Internet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) beca

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. 123 EFTA

t in actual sexual conduct"); United States v. Brand, No. 04 Cr. 194 (PKL), 2005 WL 77055, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2005) (admitting "evidence that Brand exhibited an interest in child erotica and child pornography on the intemet in the period leading up to the charged conduct" under Rule 404(b) becau

o use them for purposes of sexual massages? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. Can yo

MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 404(b) FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULE'S NOTICE REQUIREMENT Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON. MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Deer Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP York, NY 10022 Phone: Bobbi C. Sternhe

erials Qualify as "Direct Evidence" in the Case 6 CONCLUSION 7 EFTA00016207 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLES OF AUTHORITIES Cases United States v. Brand, 467 F.3d 179 (2d Cir. 2006) 4 United States v. Bid, 859 F. App'x 610 (2d Cir. 2021) 4 Other Authorities Wright & Miller, 22B Fed. Prac. & Proc.