Epstein Secrets

A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffre

A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms Villafana Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 to my co-counsel Martin We

ntiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States 9:08cv80736-KAM that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in par 6 of document 14, your own declaration, you stated that the NPA con

scope of Mr. Epstein's fee- EFTA00233057 Marie Villafana, Esq. February 18, 2010 Page 2 related payment

strongly believe that significant amounts of the fees and costs billed by Mr. Josefsberg are outside the scope of Mr. Epstein's fee- EFTA00233057 Marie Villafana, Esq. February 18, 2010 Page 2 related payment obligations under the NPA. We hope that the fee-related issues can be resolved by further settleme

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated that

A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms Villafana Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 in regards to the request b

A. Marie Villafana Assistant United States Attorney WPB Re Jeffre

tiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States 9:08cv80736-KAM that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in par 6 of document 14, your own declaration, you stated that the NPA con

United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Villafana: Thank you for your letter of July 27, 2011 to my co-counsel Martin Weinberg concerning the request by the New York District Attorney for copies of

o Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington, D.C. K&E 19439748.1 EFTA00586200 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP A. Marie Villafana July 29, 2011 Page 2 paragraph 13, for you to disclose it absent a subpoena -- which we could oppose in the jurisdiction from which it emanated.

tiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated th