Epstein Secrets

actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights

dber er et al. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards Fistos & Lehrman P.L. Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 AROLA Flori ar No.: SER CE LIST 24 EFTA00725992 DEFENDANT BRADLEY J. ED

wield this power will be guided solely by their sense of public responsibility for the attainment of justice. Young, 481 U.S. at 810, 814 (quoting Vasquez'. Hillery 474 U.S. 254, 263 (1986)). The CVRA's statutory scheme maintains this balance. Thus, the provisions of the CVRA were imported into the Fe

United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and J

6, 2010 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Maritza Milagros Vasquez 1263 S.W. 21st Terrace Miami, FL 33145 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Vasquez: Enclosed please find a copy of Re-notice of Taking your Deposition which is now scheduled for Tuesday, June 15, 2010 beginning at 10:00 a.m. Plea

q. Florida Bar No: 089737 EFTA00612073 !14r, a, • Class Action Persona:Injury Wroiigki Dnitti COtliffierCial Litigatien PiusncE.com Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos a Lehrman, P.L. May 7, 2010 Honorable Donald W. Hafele Main Judicial Complex Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 North

actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." Baxter v. Pahnigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights

FL 33401 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 38 EFTA00081219

il actions when they refuse to testify in response to mobative evidence offered against them." Baxter Pahnigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez'. Slate, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule "is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights o

d on FLSD U. 01/21/2015 Page 2 of 9 P ORAS Tam C leis Action Pe winal Injury Wconglul Otell Comer cal Lotqatton WWW.PATHTOJUSTICE COM Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. August 20, 2014 Wifredo A. Ferrer United States Attorney Southern District of Florida RE: Jane Doe

actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them.” Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); Accord, Vasquez v. State, 777 So. 2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. at 2001). The reason for this rule “is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of

scheme. At that time, I left RRA with several other RRA attorneys to form the law firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and Lehrman (“Farmer Jaffe”). I was thus with RRA for less than one year. 21. In July 2010, along with other attorneys at Farmer Jaffe and Professor Cassell, I reached favorab