Epstein Secrets

n District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

bserved that, "[f]actual admissions can be binding as judicial admissions; admissions of legal conclusions cannot." Id.(citations omitted). See also Dabertin v. HCR Manor Care, Inc., 68 F.Supp.2d 998, 1000 (N.D. III. 1999)("It is well established that judicial admissions on questions of law have no legal

Page 32 of 32 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

s of subordinate employees in the DOJ were considered judicial admissions, a party's judicial admissions on questions of law have no legal effect.6 Dabertin v. HCR Manor Care, Inc., 68 F.Supp.2d 998, 1000 (N.D. Ill. 1999). Plainly, at the time the NPA was negotiated in 2007, the then-current version of

Page 33 of 33 SERVICE LIST Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

s of subordinate employees in the DOJ were considered judicial admissions, a party's judicial admissions on questions of law have no legal effect.6 Dabertin v. HCR Manor Care, Inc., 68 F.Supp.2d 998, 1000 (N.D. Ill. 1999). Plainly, at the time the NPA was negotiated in 2007, the then-current version of

n District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

bserved that, "[f]actual admissions can be binding as judicial admissions; admissions of legal conclusions cannot." Id.(citations omitted). See also Dabertin v. HCR Manor Care, Inc., 68 F.Supp.2d 998, 1000 (N.D. Ill. 1999)("It is well established that judicial admissions on questions of law have no legal