Epstein Secrets

tted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L.

0 applies in federal proceedings to statements made in connection with prior state pleas"); see also United States v. Holmes, 794 F.2d 345, 349 (8th Cir.1986) (permitting the admission of a guilty plea from state court in a federal proceeding). 2 Because Epstein's lawyers are claiming that the correspond

f Law, Salt Lake Cty, UT, Bradley James Edwards, Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehman, PL, Fort

ed guilty to state charges based on the same conduct and has not withdrawn those pleas. See, e.g., United States I. Holmes, 794 F.2d 345, 349 (8th Cir.1986) (admitting guilty plea from state court in federal pro- ceeding). The victims intend to admit the correspondence to prove violations of the Act al

m EFTA00187401 Page I of 2 VVestiaw. Page 1 Maria Tankenson Hodge Current Firm Information Unknown

e functional, its features may be copied even if conibsion would result. American Greetings Corp.'. Dan-Dee Onportit Ina, 807 F.2d 1136, 1141 (3d Cir.1986). FT states that its packaging design was chosen because the design was pretty, so- phisticated, and showed off the novelty value of the deodorant