Epstein Secrets

t Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

s are intended to annoy, embarrass, oppress, or unduly burden him, requiring that his Motion be denied. Next, Edwards's assertion in support of his Motion for a Protective Order that the requested information is "irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence" is equally de

Defendant represented by Bradley James Edwards Farmer Jaffe Wcissing Edwards Fistos &Lehrman PL 425 N

ed: 04/17/2012) EFTA00177843 Case: 9:08-cv-80736-I<AM As of: 06/26/2013 07:08 PM EDT 14 of 16 04/17/2012 164 SUPPLEMENTAL Briefing in support of Motion for a Protective Order concerning Production, Use, and Disclosure of Plea Negotiations by Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Martin G. Weinberg (IsXSee Image at DE Ufa ) (Entered:

m EFTA00187401 Page I of 2 VVestiaw. Page 1 Maria Tankenson Hodge Current Firm Information Unknown

e them rescheduled at a convenient location. CONCLUSION For all of the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant its Motion for a Protective Order or such other relief as the Court deems appropriate. PFILM45448611 EFTA00187418 Dated: September 5, 2003 J. Fox AttorneyIdentification No. 152