ed: 04/17/2012) EFTA00177843 Case: 9:08-cv-80736-I<AM As of: 06/26/2013 07:08 PM EDT 14 of 16 04/17/2012 164 SUPPLEMENTAL Briefing in support of Motion for a Protective Order concerning Production, Use, and Disclosure of Plea Negotiations by Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Martin G. Weinberg (IsXSee Image at DE Ufa ) (Entered:

e them rescheduled at a convenient location. CONCLUSION For all of the foregoing reasons, Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant its Motion for a Protective Order or such other relief as the Court deems appropriate. PFILM45448611 EFTA00187418 Dated: September 5, 2003 J. Fox AttorneyIdentification No. 152

s are intended to annoy, embarrass, oppress, or unduly burden him, requiring that his Motion be denied. Next, Edwards's assertion in support of his Motion for a Protective Order that the requested information is "irrelevant, immaterial, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence" is equally de