Epstein Secrets

lsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Estein Farmer , Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL

Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 26 also Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1) and Fla. Stat. 768.72; Gallina v. Commerce And Industry, Ins., 2008 WL 3895918 (S.D. Ha. 2009)(unless liability for punitive damages is established at trial, the discovery sought is not relevant). In Gallina, the court held that in lig

Submitted, AI taut 9. Samna Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

opposing party's case while simultaneously brandishing it as a shield from disclosure of any Achilles heels." Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 677 (S.D. Ha. 2008). Or, as the Eleventh Circuit has articulated the principle, a litigant "can no more advance the work-product doctrine to sustain a unilatera

-PARTY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFEE, WEISSING EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

davit." Doc. #98 at 3-4 (emphasis added) (quoting El-Ad Residences at Mirarmar Condo. Ass'n, Inc.. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 716 F. Supp. 2d 1257, 1262 (S.D. Ha. 2010). Rather than heed that specific warning from the Government that he needed to provide "evidence that demonstrates the existence of the privi

nt did not use "its `best efforts' to protect the rights of [Jane Doe No. 1] (and the other victims) in this case when it failed to confer with her Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos ft Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 954.524.2820 office 954.524.

ding royalty, politicians, businessmen, and professional and personal acquaintances. Complaint, Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, No. 9:09-CV-80656- KAM (S.D. Ha. May 1, 2009). 3. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation into all

ted, /5/ Sal, P. Eeitualua Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

pposing party's case while simultaneously brandishing it as a shield from disclosure of any Achilles heels." Stern v. O'Quinn, 253 F.R.D. 663, 677 (S.D. Ha. 2008). CONCLUSION The Court should direct the Government to produce to the victims all documents that it previously withheld based on work-produc