Epstein Secrets

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradle J. a lwanls Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

n. Epstein subsequently dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The counter- claim proceeded, undergoing several amendments. As it now stands, the Fourth Amended Counterclaim has two causes of action: abuse of process and malicious prosecution. Epstein moved for summary judgment arguing that the litigation p

t Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

d factually deficient Motion for Protective Order. In support thereof, Epstein states: INTRODUCTION On or about January 9, 2013, Edwards filed his Fourth Amended Counterclaim against Epstein, asserting therein that he suffered the following damages: "a) injury to his reputation; b) mental anguish, embarrassm

700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

n. Epstein subsequently dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The counter- claim proceeded, undergoing several amendments. As it now stands, the Fourth Amended Counterclaim has two causes of action: abuse of process and malicious prosecution. Epstein moved for summary judgment arguing that the litigation p

e FL 301 Bradley J. Edwards Esquire Staftefil Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N. And

n. Epstein subsequently dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The counter- claim proceeded, undergoing several amendments. As it now stands, the Fourth Amended Counterclaim has two causes of action: abuse of process and malicious prosecution. Epstein moved for summary judgment arguing that the litigation p

matter turns to Mr. Edwards' communications with Maria Villafana, who is the United States attorney --

rocess claim has been disposed of. It was successfully won on the summary judgment and is no longer an issue. So the only operative portion of the Fourth Amended Counterclaim is count two, malicious prosecution. In that complaint, Judge, against Mr. Epstein, Mr. Edwards asserts in paragraph 24, "While pro

ort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bra . .. a lwards E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

n. Epstein subsequently dismissed his Complaint without prejudice. The counter- claim proceeded, undergoing several amendments. As it now stands, the Fourth Amended Counterclaim has two causes of action: abuse of process and malicious prosecution. Epstein moved for summary judgment arguing that the litigation p