Epstein Secrets

e's retention of documents and/or a disc that (1) Farmer Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.

lm Beach, FL 33401-6350 RE: Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards 15'h Judicial Circuit Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG Dear Niall and Joe: This letter is Jeffrey Epstein's demand to Fowler White, pursuant to section 627.4137, Florida Statutes, for the following: A statement u

factual 18:4 33:11 36:21 far 9:13 13:15 17:7 Farmer 2:8 3:17,18 4:5 12:25 13:12,16,23 14:6,8,15 15:

4:16 16:7 30:17,20 32:11,11,12 34:18 needs 5:5 28:7 32:5,8 never 18:4,6,6,6,12,12 19:13 20:17 22:2,2,2 30:21 34:10 39:8 new 8:12 27:17 48:13 Niall 2:13 4:7 24:12 nice 46:24 night 21:2 Nobody 22:19 non-privileged 11:13 27:5 normal 31:23 Notary 50:9,20 note 8:24 notes 41:13 nothing 27:15

and around 2010, when the Rothstein Finn imploded, when these e-mails were apparently confiscated, when somebody made the decision that instead of Farmer paying for the copy costs, they be handed over to Fowler White. ... (50:25-51:13.) But the fact remains ... that these materials were in the hands

. 50-2009-CA-040800XXXXMBAG In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR Dear Niall and Joe: I am writing on behalf of my client, Jeffrey Epstein, in response to your November 27, 2018, e- mail to outline Mr. Epstein's potential cla