Epstein Secrets

Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehman, 425 N A

records was to obtain them for use in a separately filed Criminal Victims Rights Act (CVRA) suit, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2, Case No. 08-80736-CIV, Marra/Johnson, which was brought for several purposes, including invalidating the /Non-Prosecution) Agreement . . . Amended Complaint at paragraph 29(4) (emphasi

700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

ds already had been prosecuting against Epstein on behalf of that same plaintiff for the better part of a year. See LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, 09-81092 Marra/Johnson; Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 23; line 4-p. 38; line 22. The federal complaint, signed by Edwards, himself, was filed in federal cou

tted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

egations in depositions and other court filings. (See, e.g., Jane Doe' Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen, Court File No. 08-80804-Civ- Marra/Johnson, DEl at 44-52.) 42 EFTA00177092 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 43 of 54 Petitioners' allegations pro

ess of $15,000.00, exclusive costs, interest, and attorneys' fees. EFTA00193811 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK seem A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JivRta)M BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN 8E STUMPF -= PA. = December 9, 2009 A. Marie Villafafia, Esq. Assi

er to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe I pstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint

RD M. SREBMCK Scow A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF MARIA NEYRA JACIUE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED

ver to Take Charge of Property of Epstein, and to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential Judgment, in Jane Doe Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893- Marra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint