Epstein Secrets

d by facsimile (561) 802-1787, and U.S. mail to: Maria Villifana, Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, 500 uth

ts irrelevant to the grand jury inquiry and was, therefore, unreasonably broad under Rule 17. Likewise, in In re Amato, 2005 WL 1429743 at *11-*12 (D. Me. June 17, 2005), the Court, relying on a number of cases dealing with searches of computers pursuant to warrants, granted a motion to quash with re

d 4777urt, nunuet; Tel us the Cc" zrasS c Itle"tatslod acs 3. Psalm tlM era a tit Waists at are (rue attar and eaten as clear es you an eiby you I:Marian I! Va Wry As Teti inlan.ta Wad InVelgale neof °Septette and M oaten Try nor parply typist asa fetlon a by we agate POI AC bind us vox =pant r man

ng Vas FUR Name Baba su)ndlo bine Rat Force Oleges shil de computed volt. Inc a rat hove vitae re Average Daly Eau,. to beenza of Be mood cool D. Me mate ad/privy that bt ealarved ty anti mereeny Dermot a zencurrevara: fbegirinitmizarny Chaves ter deny taw° 0 Bane Csa..)41; Eget( Linea Crud:

ATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 17, 2007, a true and correct copy of the forging motion was furnished by facsimile and U.S. mail to: Maria , Esq., U.S. Attorney's Office, 500 uth Australian Avenue, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. By: ROY BLACK, ESQ Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein

ts irrelevant to the grand jury inquiry and was, therefore, unreasonably broad under Rule 17. Likewise, in In re Amato, 2005 WL 1429743 at *11-*12 (D. Me. June 17, 2005), the Court, relying on a number of cases dealing with searches of computers pursuant to warrants, granted a motion to quash with re