Epstein Secrets

the relief requested above, including joinder in Farmer Jaffe's motion for sanctions and their own sancti

ned in violation of an order from U.S. I EFTA00808132 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6384 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 6 Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. See DE 1194, In Re: Rothstein Rosenfeld: Adler, P.A., No. 09-34791-RBR. If you are in possession of any of t

. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L

ized that it has been "expansively interpreted" by Florida courts. In Microbilt Corporation v. Cher Systems, Inc., 2013 WL 6628619 (Dec. 16, 2013), the Bankruptcy Court, applying Florida law, avowed: The rule of absolute immunity extends to the parties, judges, witnesses, and counsel involved and related to the jud

nt 04/09/18 Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion for Issuance of an Order to Show

any argument for an in camera review or other relief with respect to the e-mails in this Court or the appellate court or from defending himself in the Bankruptcy Court." 13 EFTA00808716 B. Fourth DCA D.E. Date Document 03/14/18 Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' Motion for Partial Relief from St

o 18 contingency fee contracts, they're asking for 19 language on it I have a copy of it 19 every communication between any member of the 20 Mr. Farmer, with his motion for 20 firm, and they throw Rothstein in just to make it 21 protective order, would not agree to that, but if 21 sexy, about thes

this stuff we've already 2 this Court, and hopefully they will get sane form 3 responded and said none, none, none, but for many 3 of relief from the Bankruptcy Court, Epstein is 4 of these items, we have asserted the privilege 4 not seeking any bankruptcy assets. He's suing 5 and we continue to assert the pri

ourt deems appropriate to protect the clients of Farmer Jaffe Weissing. I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant

er on these motions for protective order protecting privileged and work product materials from production to Epstein. 12. Now, Epstein has come to the Bankruptcy Court to pursue the discovery of privileged and attorney work product materials which the Circuit Court would not allow. See Epstein's Motion to Compel,

o 18 contingency fee contracts, they're asking for 19 language on it I have a copy of it 19 every communication between any member of the 20 Mr. Farmer, with his motion for 20 firm, and they throw Rothstein in just to make it 21 protective order, would not agree to that, but if 21 sexy, about thes

this stuff we've already 2 this Court, and hopefully they will get sane form 3 responded and said none, none, none, but for many 3 of relief from the Bankruptcy Court, Epstein is 4 of these items, we have asserted the privilege 4 not seeking any bankruptcy assets. He's suing 5 and we continue to assert the pri

ate Services 04/02/18 SJL Work on Responses to Farmer Jaffe's and the Intervenors' Show Cause Motions

Writ of Certiorari; work on Response to B. Edwards' Motion to Permit to Take the Limited Deposition of J. Epstein; review Farmer Jaffe's Motion in the Bankruptcy Court and the Bankruptcy Court hearing transcript for cites to reference in same Hours May 7, 2018 Page 10 Amount 6.20 4,650.00 0.10 0.00 3.90

www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 RESPONSE OF= BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. AND FARMER. JAFFE. WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN. P.L TO CREDITORS MOTION TO CLARIFY PRIOR ORDERS (a minor victim of sex offenses), Bradley J. Edwards,

the obligation to file a privilege log does not arise."). B. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoenas Are Not Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court The Razorback Creditors are also attempting to litigate issues relating to discovery in state court cases before this bankruptcy court. But neither

Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. 3409 Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L

en "expansively interpreted" by Florida courts. In 13 EFTA00613602 Microbilt Corporation v. Chex Systems, Inc., 2013 WL 6628619 (Dec. 16, 2013), the Bankruptcy Court, applying Florida law, avowed: The rule of absolute immunity extends to the parties, judges, witnesses, and counsel involved and related to the jud

M. EiRtAtatek SCUTT A. KORNAPAN WRY A. STUMPF MARIA NCYHA JACtIt PtRCZIK MARX A.J. SHAPIRO JAIME)

ger home. For example, in 2004, as publicly reported, he attempted to acquire the Gosman Estate, a unique property that was eventually auctioned by the Bankruptcy Court. Similarly, due to the extensive amount of time he spent in Florida and his desire to have his pilots close by and available should a flight out of