Epstein Secrets

tted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

econsideration (DE #560). Jane Doe will respond to this amended motion for reconsideration. ARGUMENT Jane Doe has an interest in Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Reconsideration (DE #560), which should be dismissed as utterly without merit (and seemingly filed simply for obstructionist purposes). Epstein's claim that the b

tted, s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, IM.

econsideration (DE #560). Jane Doe will respond to this amended motion for reconsideration. ARGUMENT Jane Doe has an interest in Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Reconsideration (DE #560), which should be dismissed as utterly without merit (and seemingly filed simply for obstructionist purposes). Epstein's claim that the b

t Lauderdale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andr

, FL 33301. EFTA00613846 Reconsideration. Three months later, Edwards has filed this purported "supplemental authority" in support of his initial Motion for Reconsideration. However, this supplemental authority" does nothing more than establish the fact that another trial court, just as this Court did in the case at h

JOSEPH L. ACKERMAN, ESQUIRE MARC NURIK, ES Ul E FARMER, JAFFE, JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE, IN THE CIR

. The Court has reviewed the Motion and is fully advised in the premises. It is thereupon CONSIDERED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant EDWARDS' Motion for Reconsideration is hereby denied. DONE AND ORDERED this _ day of January, 2011 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. 8 /04% ) DAVID F. CROVIVRe. "<$ 4

D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. Farmer , Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Lehrman, PL

ED OBJECTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Motion for Reconsideration and/or for Request Rule 4 Review and Appeal of Portions of the Magistrate's Order (DE 462) pursuant to Rule 60, Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 4, Rule 4(c) and