Epstein Secrets

d before this Court and requested that there be a master appointed to help resolve this issue, and ultimately, I became involved in the case. Mr. Farmer is representing the child in OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, INC. (305) 358-8875 EFTA00731384 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1

sert the privilege. And I'm seeing legally some appellate issues with that one. Actually, I think we may end up being in a reversible situation in the State Court on that, if it goes before Appellate Court scrutiny. So I'm concerned at this point legally telling Mr. Edwards and telling Mr. Farmer that they

ourt deems appropriate to protect the clients of Farmer Jaffe Weissing. I HEREBY CERTIFY that, pursuant

materials which the Circuit Court would not allow. See Epstein's Motion to Compel, DE 807. III. Memorandum of Law A. Discovery Issues Related to the State Court Issued Subpoena Arc Not Properly Before the Bankruptcy Court Despite Epstein's stated position to the contrary, neither 28 U.S.C. §§ 152 or 1334 co

in. The Movants in these show cause proceedings (Farmer Jaffe, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.) have acknowl

ns is of no moment in these proceedings. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Movants contend that Epstein's

stein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the Court retains jurisdiction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards, or his client. This type of Order was essential to protect Farmer Jaffe and its client from the potential problems that could arise

so produced containing 3,804 pages of documents in the first box and 3,880 pages of documents in the second box, totaling 7,684 pages. In May 2012, the State Court Judge Crow ordered 163 pages of documents from the February 23, 2011 privilege log be produced and Edwards and Fanner Jaffe complied. The remaining

in. The Movants in these show cause proceedings (Farmer Jaffe, Bradley J. Edwards and L.M.) have acknowl

ns is of no moment in these proceedings. The alleged privileged e-mails and all issues related to privilege and waiver are currently pending before the State Court. CONCLUSION As the sole basis for seeking to hold Epstein liable for a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order, Edwards contends that Epstein'

y to Jeffrey Epstein's Response in Opposition to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and

ed the adequacy of Mr. Edwards's privilege log years ago. 6 EFTA00795932 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6358 Filed 04/12/18 Page 7 of 12 At one point, the State Court—the only Court with jurisdiction over the adequacy of the log— agreed that the log was insufficient and then before requiring a revised log reversed

www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 RESPONSE OF= BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. AND FARMER. JAFFE. WEISSING, EDWARDS. FISTOS & LEHRMAN. P.L TO CREDITORS MOTION TO CLARIFY PRIOR ORDERS (a minor victim of sex offenses), Bradley J. Edwards,

relevance, burdensomeness, and attorney-client and other privileges regarding the Razorback Creditors' subpoena. Instead, these issues are left to the State Court judge presiding over their case to decide. I. BACKGROUND The procedural background surrounding the Razorback Creditor's motion is important to t

ilege and do a 11 against Brad Edwards individually, and it was 12 privilege log. 12 against one of the claimants, 12A individually. 13 Now, Mr. Farmer's office on behalf of 13 '11W COURT: So It's not against the debtor 14 LM wants to do that We don't think Mars 14 estate. 15 appropriate. We thi

1O41O111: Good morning, your Honor, MR. NESVEZTH: — both of whom are MOTE MOTION TO COMP ILPRODUCTTON OF DOCUMENT'S FROM TRUSIta, 12 familiar with the State Court angle on this than 1 12 PURSUANT TO COMMENT PRCOUCTION PROTOCOL BSTABLISHED 13 am, so they came along to be able to elucidate that BY DB0672 (S07),

control. "Villain, Ann Marie C. MUSAFLS1)" <Ann.Maria[email protected]> OMB/2007 05 £4 AM To 'Ja

the guidelines 4. Instead of agreeing that the girls can sue Epstein. they cannot sue him and instead are bound to apply to a trust administered by the State Court (Jay and I have addresSed this at least three times and it keeps appearing in his versions) 5. They changed the stale charge that he has to plead g