Epstein Secrets

lsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Estein Farmer , Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL

privacy unless the intrusion is warranted by the necessity of a compelling state interest. In an opinion which predated the adoption of section 23, the First District aptly characterized the nature of this right. EFTA00317229 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 545 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2010 Page 20 of 37 D

2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 [email protected] Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL

pstein 08-CVS0l 19 Page No. 12 warranted by the necessity of a compelling state interest. In an opinion which predated the adoption of section 23, the First District aptly characterized the nature of this right. A fundamental aspect of personhood's integrity is the power to control what we shall reveal about ou

outh.net Counsel for £?.efendant Jeffrey Estein Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman,PL

privacy unless the intrusion is warranted by the necessity of a compelling state interest. In an opinion which predated the adoption of section 23, the First District aptly characterized the nature of this right. Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 545 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2010 Page 20 of 37 Doe v. Ep

D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. Farmer , Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Lehrman, PL

Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 12 warranted by the necessity of a compelling state interest. In an opinion which predated the adoption of section 23, the First District aptly characterized the nature of this right. A fundamental aspect of personhood's integrity is the power to control what we shall reveal about ou