Epstein Secrets

et. Marla Farmer v. Epstein and Maxwell (2019) -11)er E- GO - l=it.61" ToPOCINC. -route.: CrFiCer2 - IL Y1L3 GO) • 14 4DthiP: On April 16, 2019, Maria Farmer went public and filed a sworn affidavit in federal court in New York, alleging that she and her 15-year-old sister, Annie, had been sexually assault

in New York, alleging that she and her 15-year-old sister, Annie, had been sexually assaulted by Epstein and Maxwell in separate locations in 1996. Farmer met Epstein and. Maxwell at her graduate art gallery reception at the New York Academy of Art in 1995. The following year, in the summer of 1996, t

r2 - IL Y1L3 GO) • 14 4DthiP: On April 16, 2019, Maria Farmer went public and filed a sworn affidavit in

suit against Dershowitz, ammaMALM Mustain 11160 EFTA00264705 • 5M/22,3:62pm POLICE 5ofait- Ingac: I Mt ra t- pi 11-1E: st in t 1 wikipeciTi Bloom asserted that the woman had received threats. The suit was dropped on November 4, 2016. Trump attorney Alan Garten denied the allegations, while Ep

4 25 • • J8RPEPS2 speaking this morning is Annie Farmer. MS. FARMER: Good morning, your Honor. THE COURT: Good morning. MS. FARMER: Annie, A-n-n-i-e, Farmer, F-a-r-m-e-r. I had the opportunity to speak at Jeffrey Epstein's bail hearing, and I really appreciate that you heard me and listened to me that day

I am so sorry that others will not have the opportunity to stand before him the way that I did. But I'm here today to speak on behalf of my sister, Maria Farmer, who could not be here. 58 Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell not only assaulted her, but as we're hearing from so many of these brave women here

t I'm here today to speak on behalf of my sister, Maria Farmer, who could not be here. Jeffrey Epstein, G

so proud of all of you victims who are here today and are able to voice yourselves today. I will not and cannot comment on the criminal case, or Ms. Bloom's communications with her clients. Ms. Bloom would like to share three of her client's statements for the record. Here are the statements. Statement

ted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

eing asserted." Bloom v. Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (11th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloom was only mentioned in the original pleading vaguely in one instance

the original complaint gave notice to the defendant of the claim now being asserted." Bloom v. Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (11th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloo

ted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

being asserted." Bloom' Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (11th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloom was only mentioned in the original pleading vaguely in one instance

r the original complaint gave notice to the defendant of the claim now being asserted." Bloom' Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (11th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloo

ted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L

eing asserted." Bloom v. Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (11th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloom was only mentioned in the original pleading vaguely in one instance

the original complaint gave notice to the defendant of the claim now being asserted." Bloom v. Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (11th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloo

ted, /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE. WEISSING, P.L. DWARDS. FIST0S & LEHRMAN,

the original complaint gave notice to the defendant of the claim now being asserted." Bloom'. Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (I 1th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloo

eing asserted." Bloom'. Alvereze, 498 F. App'x 867, 883 (I 1th Cir. 2012). In Bloom, the Eleventh Circuit found that the motion to amend to add Mrs. Bloom to Mr. Bloom's claim did not satisfy the relation back test because Mrs. Bloom was only mentioned in the original pleading vaguely in one instance