Epstein Secrets

tigation—in direct contravention of the parties' Non Prosecution Agreement—and iss another subpoena seeking in this case. arraido 19, Subpoena to Marina . In the subpoena, AUSA directs Marina to appear on July 1, 2008 to give testimony and produce documents to FO.1 07-103 West Palm Beach. The att

re. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States I Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base to minors, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 859(a)

ral prosecutors have pursued under the federal sta tes at issue here. When asked, the closest case suggested by the prosecutors was United States I Boehm—and it hardly could differ more from Mr. Epstein's case. In Boehm, the defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base

, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phon Fax 5 From: Ocariz, Humberto H. (SHB) sent Mnnelav Sentemher 74 701 To Subject: RE: Conflict Check Maria. Thanks. I am also going to need the list of the 40 girls who will be my clients. Can you send those as well? Thanks. Bert Ocariz From Sent: Mon

penses if the Court finds that such expenses fall within the restitution statute. Because any restitution is deducted from the agreed $1.2 million, Boehm, through his attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, has waived notice of such motion, which may be filed with the Court ex pane under seal. After 30 days from

M. SREBNICK Scan' A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPF. MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED L

ts. In addition to the well-established state restitution statute, the defense offered a federal proposal that was similar to the resolution in the Boehm case, where the conduct was far more egregious. There, the defendant bought and distributed crack cocaine and cocaine to underage girls; admitted t