Epstein Secrets

of factors strongly weighs in favor of transfer. Jackson v. Executive Airlines, Inc., Civ. No.2000-121, 20

ng by a preponderance of the evidence that transfer is necessary. In re Charles Schwab & Co. Sec. Litig.. 69 F.Supp.2d 734, 735 (D.Vi.1999) (citing Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp., 431 F.2d 22, 25 (3d Cir. 1970)). Although a trial judge is afforded great discretion in deciding this motion, he or she should not disturb a plaint

of factors strongly weighs in favor of transfer. Jackson v. Executive Airlines, Inc.. Civ. No.2000-121, 20

ng by a preponderance of the evidence that transfer is necessary. In re Charles Schwab & Co. Sec. Litig., 69 F.Supp.2d 734, 735 (D.Vi.1999) (citing Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp. 431 F.2d 22, 25 (3d Cir. 1970)). Although a trial judge is afforded great discretion in deciding this motion, he or she should not disturb a plainti

eciding this motion, he or she should not disturb a plaintiff's choice of forum unless the balance of factors strongly weighs in favor of transfer. Jackson v. Executive Airlines, Inc., Civ. No. 2000-121, 2001 U.S. Dist. 8004 LEXIS at *7 (D.V.I. June 7, 2001). A defendant seeking a transfer will not ov

y a preponderance of the evidence that transfer is necessary. In re Charles Schwab & Co. Sec. Litig., 69 F. Supp. 2d 734, 735 (D.V.I. 1999) (citing Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp., 431 F.2d 22, 25 (3d Cir. 1970)). Although a trial judge is afforded great discretion in deciding this motion, he or she should not disturb a plai