Epstein Secrets

22(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 69 EFTA00224203 VCOURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE itn N.D. Tex. U.S. I Jackson, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6168/N.D. Tex. 2002); see U.S. I Jackson, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 539 (N.D. Tex. 2002) for details of facts; and U.S. I. Jackson

); underlying case U.S. I Gawk, Case No. 5- 05-MJ-341 (N.D.N.Y. 2005) Telephone Mayor solicited

Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage t in sex ac. 2422(b); 2423(b) Sting 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Not Consummated Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is gra

d without bond. 2422(b) Not Consummated Sting 74 EFTA00226322 COURT CASES . FACILI TY . FACTS/COMMUNICATS: CHARGWRiii ., D. Neb. U.S. I Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) *State Conspiracy charge dropped, no federal conspiracy Internet Internet chats with "14 yr-old";

); underlying case U.S. Gosek, Case No. 5- 05-MJ-341 (N.D.N.Y. I 2005) Telephone Mayor solicit

llular phone. 2422(6) Consummated 68 EFTA00226328 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATIO* CHARGE U.S. I Spurlock, 386 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Internet Internet chat room "Daughters who love daddies"; chats with "mother" of 3 kids; masturbated in front of webcam while having sexually e

F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11`" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA00079414 U.S. v. Jackson. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); U.S. v. Bianchi,

ission on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Hicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage in sex act. Defendant claimed no violation o

F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA01729485 U.S. v. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge dropped because no conspiracy possible with undercover agent); U.S. v. Bianchi,

ssion on Pornography more than 20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(6) No Information W.D. Mo. U.S. v. Flicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36625 (W.D. Mo. 2005) Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage in sex act. Defendant claimed no violation o