Epstein Secrets

ys Before: HONORABLE RONALD L. ELLIS United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MARK BRENER, a/k/a "Michael,' CECIL SUWAL, a/k/a "Katie,' a/k/a "Kate," TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," and TANYA HOLLANDER, a/k/a "Tania Hollander," Defendants

retion of the trial court, and a refusal to grant a continuance will be set aside only upon a showing of clear abuse of discretion. United States Jackson, 5t9 F.2d 517, 528 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 985, 97 S.Ct 1682, 52 LEd2d 879 (1977); United States' Webb, 533 F2d 391, 396 (8th Cir. 1976

3, 33 I.L.M. 44, pmbl. ("Recognizing the grow- ing importance of trade in services for the iili growth and development of e world eco- nomy"); cf. Gulf Oil Corp. Copp Paving Co., Inc., 419 U.S. 186, 19 , 95 S.Ct. 392, 42 L.Ed.2d 378 (1974Xholding that, under the Interstate Commerce Clause, the " 'in comme

993), and "conclusory allegations, unwarranted deductions of facts, or legal conclusions masquerading as fact will not prevent dismissal." Jackson ■ BellSouth Telecommunications, 372 F.3d 50, 1262- 1263 (11th Cir.2004) (citations omitted). 'To survive a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs must d

an & Goggin, Orlando, FL, Kimble Clark Bouchillon, Frost Tamayo Sessums & Aranda, P.A., Bartow, FL, Mime A. Hanna, Cobb & Cole, Daytona Beach, FL, Michael Charles Huddleston, Huddleston & Teal, P.A., DeLand, FL, for Defendants. Paul Prewitt, Daytona Beach, FL, pro se. ORDER MOODY, J. •1 THIS CAUSE c

1989) (en bane) (per curiam). The court exercises its discretion based on consideration of II private and pu .c factors that trace their origin to Gulf Oil Corp. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 508-09, 67 S.Q. 839, 91 .Ed. 1055 (1947). Showing some deference to the plaintiffs choice of forum, the court must conside

NA v. CITY Mark H. FELDMAN pro se, Plaintiff, v. JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, etc., et al., Defendants No.

erse effect upon interstate commerce. Hospital Building Company v. Trustees of Rex Hospital, 425 U.S. 738, 96 S. Ct. 1848, 48 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1976); Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co., 419 U.S. 186, 95 S. Ct. 392, 42 L. Ed. 2d 378 (1974); Burke v. Ford, 389 U.S. 320, 88 S. Ct. 443, 19 L. Ed. 2d 554 (1967). If so