Epstein Secrets

ra on 4/28/2009. (cqs) (Entered: 04/29/2009) Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to 1 Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. (Pike, Michael) (Entered: 05/01/2009) ENDORSED ORDER granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. Jeffrey Epstein response due 5/6/2009. Signed by

red: 11/10/2010) RESPONSE to Motion re 14 Renewed MOTION to Quash, 7 MOTION to Quash Service of Process and Supporting Memorandum of Law Plaintiff, MJ, Response to Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process and Motion for Hearing to Prove Fraud, to Prove Proper Service, to Obtain Sanctions for Ep

enior Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp. (sh) (Entered: 04/30/2009) 05/15/2009 12 "WRONG EVENT USED, RE-DOCKETED AS ENTRY 13 " NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein of Initial Disclosures (Brewer, William) Modified on 5/19/2009 (Is). (Entered: 05/15/2009) 05/15/2009 Initial Disclosure(s) by Jeffrey Epstein. [See Image at DE #12] (Is

mit a revised, more detailed log. See N.L.R.B. I. Jackson Hosp. Corp., 257 F.R.D. 302, 307 (D.D.C. 2009) (

responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of

mit a revised, more detailed log. See N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Hosp. Corp., 257 F.R.D. 302, 307 (D.D.C. 2009) (

responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(2)(1) Finally. Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of

mit a revised, more detailed log. See N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Hosp. Corp. 257 F.R.D. 302, 307 (D.D.C. 2009) (c

responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of

mit a revised, more detailed log. See N.L.R.B. v. Jackson Hosp. Corp., 257 F.R.D. 302, 307 (D.D.C. 2009) (

responsive to this request that are not otherwise protected opinion work product. No production under this request is necessary. 6. Request No. 25—Initial Disclosures under FRCP 26(a)(1) Finally, Petitioners request that the Government comply with its obligation to serve initial disclosures under Federal Rule of