Epstein Secrets

AL INJURY DAMAGES NOT RECOVERABLE UNDER RICO 1. Jackson v. Bellsouth Communications, 372 F.3d 1250 (11th

A 1992). 2. Palmus Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, 881 So.2d 565 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2004). 3. Bivens Gardens Office Bldg., Inc. v. Barnett Banks of Fla., Inc., 140 F.3d 898, 906, 908 (11th Cir. 1998). 4. Baisch v. Gallina, 346 F.3d 366, 373 (2d Cir. 2003). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY

AL INJURY DAMAGES NOT RECOVERABLE UNDER RICO 1. Jackson v. Bellsouth Communications, 372 F.3d 1250 (11th

A 1992). 2. Palmus Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company, 881 So.2d 565 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2004). 3. Bivens Gardens Office Bldg., Inc. v. Barnett Banks of Fla., Inc., 140 F.3d 898, 906, 908 (1191 Cir. 1998). 4. Baisch v. Gallina, 346 F.3d 366, 373 (2d Cir. 2003). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY

d after the Federal Rico Act. Therefore, Florida's statutes must be construed alongside the Federal Rico Act to obtain true meaning and application. Jackson v. BellSouth Telecommunications. 372 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir. 2004), cited in Fla. Stat. 772.103, annotated, (analysis applied to claims under the Fede

that the letters/communications proximately caused their damages. Id. at 573-574. The Palmas Court, citing to Bivens Gardens Office Bide., Inc. v. Barnett Banks of Fla., Inc., 140 F.3d 898, 906, 908 (11th Cir. 1998), further reasoned that "a party whose injuries result 'merely from the misfortunes visited u