Epstein Secrets

ys Before: HONORABLE RONALD L. ELLIS United States Magistrate Judge Southern District of New York UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MARK BRENER, a/k/a "Michael,' CECIL SUWAL, a/k/a "Katie,' a/k/a "Kate," TEMEKA RACHELLE LEWIS, a/k/a "Rachelle," and TANYA HOLLANDER, a/k/a "Tania Hollander," Defendants

retion of the trial court, and a refusal to grant a continuance will be set aside only upon a showing of clear abuse of discretion. United States Jackson, 5t9 F.2d 517, 528 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 985, 97 S.Ct 1682, 52 LEd2d 879 (1977); United States' Webb, 533 F2d 391, 396 (8th Cir. 1976

view would still "tend to iron out sentencing differences." Id. C 2008 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. EFTA00192128 Page 6 ' F.3d --, 2008 WL 253040 (C.A.11 (Ala.)) (Cite as: — F.3d —) Booker further held that in performing this review, we must measure "reasonableness" agains

993), and "conclusory allegations, unwarranted deductions of facts, or legal conclusions masquerading as fact will not prevent dismissal." Jackson ■ BellSouth Telecommunications, 372 F.3d 50, 1262- 1263 (11th Cir.2004) (citations omitted). 'To survive a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs must d

an & Goggin, Orlando, FL, Kimble Clark Bouchillon, Frost Tamayo Sessums & Aranda, P.A., Bartow, FL, Mime A. Hanna, Cobb & Cole, Daytona Beach, FL, Michael Charles Huddleston, Huddleston & Teal, P.A., DeLand, FL, for Defendants. Paul Prewitt, Daytona Beach, FL, pro se. ORDER MOODY, J. •1 THIS CAUSE c

why the district court erred in denying the motion. uii Conseq tly, we consider the issue waived. See Wilburn Mid-South Health Dev., Inc., 343 F.3d 1274, 1 1 (10th Cir.2003) ("We ... will not ( consider issues that are raised n appeal but not adequately addressed"); Adler Wal-Mart Stores, In

a, 84 F.3d 61, 69 (2d Cir. 1996) (internal citation omitted); see also United States v. Paulino, 445 F.3d 211, 221 (2d Cir. 2006); United States v. Zackson, 12 F.3d 1178, 1182 (2d Cir. 1993). Under this approach, uncharged acts are admissible in a conspiracy case where they are used to (i) explain the

of fairness and decency would be offended were judicial processes invoked to obtain a conviction against the accused." United States v. Schmidt, 105 F.3d 82,91 (2d Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). "Such outrageous or conscience shocking behavior involves egregious invasion

elements 1 the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." Jackson Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61

No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. hups://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Full&prit=HTMLE&mt=FederalGov... 2/27/2008 EFTA00192004 504 F.3d 737 504 F.3d 737, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,330, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,672 (Cite as: 504 F.3d 737) use," "sexual abuse," or "abusive sexua

4178190 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 4, 2008) 235 United States v. Young, No. 08 Cr. 285 (KMK), 2008 WL 4178190 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 4, 2008) 234 United States v. Zackson, 12 F.3d 1178 (2d Cir. 1993) 253 United States v. Zodhiates, 901 F.3d 137 (2d Cir. 2018) 122, 126, 131 Valentine v. Konteh, 395 F.3d 626 (6th

run.") (citing Falter, 23 F.3d at 425-26). And other circuits have emphasized this distinction in the context of Section 3283. Leo Sure Chief, 438 F.3d, at 922-25; Jeffries, 405 F.3d 685. Read together, the Second Circuit's decisions in Weingarten, Vernon, Enterprise, and Falter establish that Cong