Epstein Secrets

t be: an "efficient and compelling purpose," United States v. Meacham, 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10' Cir. 1997); a "motivating purpose," United States v Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1083 (56 Cir. 1995), or "at least one of the defendant's motivations for taking the trip in the first place," United States v Ellis,

COUNSEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Dershowitz: You have asked me to review the procedures and methods employed by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in injecting itself into the State of Florida investigation and prosecution of your client, Jeffrey Epstein. In short, and as will be set forth at

al conduct must be: an "efficient end compelliog purpos United States' Meacham 115 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10°' Cir. 1991); a "motivating purpose," Unitt. Campbell 49 F.3d 1079, 1083 (5° 1995), or "at least one of the defendant's motivations for taking the trip in the first place," United States I. Ellis 935 F

COUNSEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Dershowitz: You have asked me to review the procedures and methods employed by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida in injecting itself into the State of Florida investigation and prosecution of your client, Jeffrey Epstein. in short, and as will be set forth at

filing a complaint with (a) court.'" Oppenheon I. Campbell, 571 F.2d 660, 663 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (quoting Fed

in and around 2005 to 2007. the Defendant and others were the subject of a federal criminal investigation conducted by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (hereafter "the U.S. Attorney's Office") for crimes committed against the petitioners and other similarly situated victims. In around September 200