Epstein Secrets

e copied by Fowler White and provided to him at a later date. On February I, 2018, Fowler White delivered copies of the documents and the items that Scott Link had flagged. One of those items was a CD with handwriting on the front stating "Epstein Bates Stamp." Inspection of that CD indicated that it was "

e prosecution of those civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. When the RRA law firm imploded, Edwards joined in forming the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe"), and continued prosecuting those cases. Days after the destruction of RRA, Jeffrey Epstein, for the pur

194] because Fowler White allegedly retained a copy of the "subject documents" and passed these documents on to Mr. Epstein and his current counsel, Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach. [D.E. 6326 at 6-11]. The Court incorporates by reference the allegations made by Farmer Jaffe in the Motion for Order to Show

. 10681 and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jafe, Weissing, Edwards, Fixtos & Lehrman, P.L [D.E. 1194] (the "Agreed Order"). The Agreed Order [D.E. 1194] stated that: Fowler White will not retain any copies

k between the printing of the documents in December 2010 and 2 Movants claim that current counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in a pending state court case (Scott Link, Esq.) sent counsel for Bradley Edwards in that case (Jack Scarola, Esq.) a flash drive which purported to duplicate "the disc we located in Fowler

1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L ("Farmer"), was adequately resolved by agreement of the parties as follows. The law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P

CD Q: Do you see paragraph four in that document? A: You have asked me that question before. Yes. Q: And in that paragraph four, it indicates that Scott Link informed you that he had located a CD. MR. LINK: Yes, sir, that's what it says. BY MR. CASSELL: Q: Did he tell you anything about L.M. when he in

tion derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which case? MR