Epstein Secrets

194] because Fowler White allegedly retained a copy of the "subject documents" and passed these documents on to Mr. Epstein and his current counsel, Scott Link and Kara Rockenbach. [D.E. 6326 at 6-11]. The Court incorporates by reference the allegations made by Farmer Jaffe in the Motion for Order to Show

vised in the premises, the Court finds as follows. EFTA00793957 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6366 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 8 I. ALLEGATIONS Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fixtos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe") filed the Motion for Order to Show Cause [D.E. 6326] alleging that the attorneys at the

k between the printing of the documents in December 2010 and 2 Movants claim that current counsel for Jeffrey Epstein in a pending state court case (Scott Link, Esq.) sent counsel for Bradley Edwards in that case (Jack Scarola, Esq.) a flash drive which purported to duplicate "the disc we located in Fowler

rder (DE 1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to His Request Filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. (hereinafter "Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing"). DE 1194. Movants request sanctions against Fowler White

CD Q: Do you see paragraph four in that document? A: You have asked me that question before. Yes. Q: And in that paragraph four, it indicates that Scott Link informed you that he had located a CD. MR. LINK: Yes, sir, that's what it says. BY MR. CASSELL: Q: Did he tell you anything about L.M. when he in

information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which