Epstein Secrets

misconduct to institute and to participate in legal proceedings against alleged offenders.” Fed. R. Evid. 412 advisory committee’s note; see also Michigan v. Lucas, 500 U.S. 145, 149-50 (1991) (Rape shield statutes represent the valid legislative determination that victims of rape and Case 9:08-cv-801

Jane Doe No. 102 in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery. Date: May 29, 2009 Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 124 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009

Epstein’s computer that reflected many of the names of underage females Epstein abused across the country and the world, including locations such as Michigan, California, West Palm Beach, New York, New Mexico, and Paris, France. See Journal (hereinafter “The Journal” or “Holy Grail”) (Exhibit “F”) (identif

against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one example) a complaint filed by attorney Robert Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit “B”). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102 was 15 years old when Ghislaine Maxwell

Epstein’s computer that reflected many of the names of underage females Epstein abused across the country and the world, including locations such as Michigan, California, West Palm Beach, New York, New Mexico, and Paris, France, See Journal (hereinafter “The Journal” or “Holy Grail”) (Exhibit “F”) (identif

aints against Epstein contained less detail about sexual abuse than (as one aml a complaint filed by attorney Robert Josephsberg from the law firm of Podhurst Orseck. See Complaint, Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein (Exhibit “B”). As recounted in detail in this Complaint, Jane Doe 102 was 15 years old when Ghislaine Maxwell