Epstein Secrets

icense .-. Airline Transport Pilot. Investigation Continues. N A R R A T I V E # 39 ****** ********** ********** Entered Reported By: By.: On Frida , February 3, 2006, I had made arrangements to meet with at the Palm Beach Police Station. At approximately static, 00pmn...Mt interview with sh

of 04/05/2005 at 4:00 PM with an arrival in New York City of 6:15PM. Flight crew captain David Rodgers, co-captain, Larry Visoski, flight engineer Larry Morrison. Call sign N900.7E; a note stating Bye J. thank you hand written not messages 11-Glenn 12:30 chicken, 4, 3 September Big Screen x8, rk Sunday @

From: Sent To: Subject: Frida , December 17, 2010 12:45 PM RE: Request for Advice and Guidance on Potential Office-Wide Recusal - Crime Victims Rights Litigation As your office

cally, he represented= (Epstein's number one co-conspirator whowas actually named as such in the NPA), his housekeeper (Louella Ruboyo), his pilots Larry Morrison, Larry Visoski, David Rogers, William Hammond and Robert Roxburgh. (Hammond and Roxburgh were not deposed but the others were.) Our understanding i

. the 1 more. ‘than 500 entries on the docket sheét for’ ‘Jane we + : 7 : “4 Doe’ s (consolidated) case will confirm (see-Case no. 9:08- 30119 (S.D: Fla. ): (case number. for consolidated eee Rongee : . cases on discovery), Jane Doe.and other. plaintiffs have made exhaustive attempts to, obtain inform

ere all taking the Fifth (like Epstein) rather than provide information in discovery. For example, I was given reason to believe that Larry Visoski, Larry Harrison, David Rogers, Louella Rabuyo, ME, Ghislaine Maxwell, Mark Epstein, and Janusz Banasiak all had lawyers paid for by Epstein. Because Epstein and the

ROCEEDINGS Deposition taken before Cynthia Hopkins, Registered Professional Reporter and Florida Professional Reporter, and Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, in the above cause. and JACK. ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Pal

response to probative evidence offered against them.” Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976); accord Vasquez v. State, 777 So.2d 1200, 1203 (Fla. App. 2001). The reason for this rule “is both logical and utilitarian. A party may not trample upon the rights of others and then escape the conseque

tein’s executive assistant and procurer of girls for him to abuse), Larry Visoski (Epstein’s personal pilot), Dave Rogers (Epstein’s personal pilot), Larry Harrison (Epstein’s personal pilot), Louella Rabuyo (Epstein’s housekeeper), Nadia Marcinkova (Epstein’s live-in sex slave), Ghislaine Maxwell (manager of Eps

the litigation of his abuse of process claim against Edwards. For support, he relies primarily on the decision of Wolfe v. Foreman, 2013 WL 3724763 (Fla. 3d DCA July 17, 2013), wherein the Third District found that the litigation privilege barred both an abuse of process claim and a malicious prosecut

tein’s executive assistant and procurer of girls for him to abuse), Larry Visoski (Epstein’s personal pilot), Dave Rogers (Epstein’s personal pilot), Larry Harrison (Epstein’s personal pilot), Louella Rabuyo (Epstein’s housekeeper), Nadia Marcinkova (Epstein’s live-in sex slave), Ghislaine Maxwell (manager of Eps