Epstein Secrets

me whether we have a deal no later than COB tomorrow, Tuesday, October 23, 2007. Thanks, -----Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto: Sent: Frida , October 19, 2007 4:05 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: - I have reviewed your proposed language and wanted to raise a few areas of concern. First,

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the

whether we have a deal no later than COB tomorrow, Tuesday, October 23, 2007. Thanks, • ----Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto: Sent: Frida . October 19, 2007 4:05 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: I have reviewed your proposed language and wanted to raise a few areas of concern. First, I

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the

whether we have a deal no later than COB tomorrow, Tuesday, October 23, 2007. Thanks, • ----Original Message From: Jay Lefkowitz (mailto: Sent: Frida , October 19, 2007 4:05 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: - I have reviewed your proposed language and wanted to raise a few areas of concern. First,

nitially the idea. I am not sure why you seem to be moving in another direction. I also cannot understand why the draft affirmatively requests that J Davis select a lawyer whose firm is sizeable enough to litigate multiple trials simultaneously. That seems to be directly at odds with the purpose of the