Epstein Secrets

icitly admitted that BOP operations failed when it brought criminal charges against the two BOP officers on duty the night of Epstein's suicide. See United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.). A recent report by the Department of Justice's Office of Inspector General has revealed further problems at

at issue may be withheld under Exemption 7(A). (See Mem. of L. in Supp. of the Fed. Bureau of Prisons' Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 25 [hereinafter "Gov't Br."], at 7.) Exemption 7(A) permits withholding of "records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that product

icitly admitted that BOP operations failed when it brought criminal charges against the two BOP officers on duty the night of Epstein's suicide. See United States v. Noel, No. 19-cr-830 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.). A recent report by the Department of Justice's Office of Inspector General has revealed further problems at

at issue may be withheld under Exemption 7(A). (See Mem. of L. in Supp. of the Fed. Bureau of Prisons' Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 25 [hereinafter "Gov't Br."], at 7.) Exemption 7(A) permits withholding of "records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that product

eclude the opinion. In this circumstance, the lasting mental impact of a crime is at best "minimally probative" of whether that crime was committed. United States v. Hendricks, 921 F.3d 320, 329 (2d Cir. 2019). It also carries a high risk of Rule 403 prejudice by suggesting that the psychological impact on All

t the time of the event observed or at the time of testifying. United States v. DiPaolo, 804 F.2d 225, 229-30 (2d Cir. 1986) (cleaned up) (cited in Gov't Br. at 11 and Def. Br. at 12); accord United States v. Robinson, 583 F.3d 1265, 1272 (10th Cir. 2009) ("Illegal drug use does not merely bear on the [