Epstein Secrets

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

le Cause Affidavit Palm Beach Police Department Agency ORI# FLO 500600 to model lingerie for a wealthy Palm Beacher. ewas taken to Epstein's house Iodated on El Brillo Way. introduced-to Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein had his personal chef prepare dinner fo:rtlltand••• At the conclusion of dinner~d Epstein

ting the offense alleged in Count Two of this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to'Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(c) (1), any property, real and personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of the o

EIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-2 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which She did. e, In or about 2005, EmplOyee-a, Iodated in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed a telephone call to Minor Victim-2 in order to schedule an appointment for

ting the offense alleged in Count Two of this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to'Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(c) (1), any property, real and personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of the o

EIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-2 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which She did. e, In or about 2005, EmplOyee-a, Iodated in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed a telephone call to Minor Victim-2 in order to schedule an appointment for

ting the offense alleged in Count Two of this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to'Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(c) (1), any property, real and personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of the o

EIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-2 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which She did. e, In or about 2005, EmplOyee-a, Iodated in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed a telephone call to Minor Victim-2 in order to schedule an appointment for