Epstein Secrets

2:44 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY Case 9:08-cv,80736-KA.ocurnen\ 48-5 Emered on FLSD Do.03/21/2011 I I :sentenced not later y,an October 26, 2007-. the UnitedjStates bas 110 objection to J;:pstein seJfsreporting to begin ~rving hls sentence ·not later than January 4, 2008. • 12. Epstein agrees that.he will no

lty and to ·provide compensation in the tQanner aescribed ab()ye, ifEpsteirt successfully fulfills allt>fthe tenns ~ _conditi9M of this agreement, the United Stat~s 1,1~0 agrees that it will niH institute: BilY criminal charges against any potential ~~onspirators ofEpstein, inclµding but not limited toi Sarah Ke

offense includcs; ;but is net limitadto; a conviction liy a foderabor miUtary'tribunal,-including courts-martial conducted by the Armed Forcos of tho United Status,, >and includes a conviction-orentry of a ploa of',guilty or nolo contendere resulting in a-sanctiun in anyistato of dio United-States or other juris

he gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public record. Ifthe United States receives a Freedom ofInformation Act request or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agreement, it will provide notice to Epstein

ll.· .. attempt to obstruct justice, or ... to threaten, injure, or intimidate, a prospective witness or juror." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(t)(2)(B); see also United States v. Friedman, 837 F.2d 48 (2d Cir. 1988). The Bail Reform Act lists four factors to be considered in the detention analysis: (1) the nature and circ

text of the agreement purports to bind “the Government.” See Annabi, Tl\ F.2d at 672. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (“Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it

vaginal area of. a fourteen year old minor, there is sufficient probable cause to charge him with Lewd and Lascivious Molestation, in violation of Florida State Statute 800.04 (5), a second degree felony. The foregoing instrument was sworn to or affirmed before me this 1'1 day of May, 2006 by Det Joe Recarey, who

Criminal Justice System. The examiner has qualified an expert witness on numerous occasions in state and federalcourt, and was the polygraphist in United States'. Piccinonna [8B5 F2d 1539 (11th Cir. 1989)1, United States. . Luis Rodriguez (Uniteig States District Court, Southern District of Florida, case num

. daldat nanonal 061fn, ctiterksni), op, dlostdry. 'mu* of; untsUon a metal Malt Vieletlat Sawa Stres,acatly Its adaddultaidIrraedtatalittnuala in the Unitod States. Oro sEleelka SECRET Sdnedua, Desired: °Sul Tim (IC Tcnry 0 le:wary I Suntans &day Expected: "egitet V1-(1-fte"' Dab AvaWaa' CtuGS 4 1 acbc

vaginal area ofS a fourteen Syear old minor, there is sufficient probable cause to charge him with Lewd and Lascivious Molestation, in violation of Florida State Statute 800.04 (5), a second degree felony. The foregoing instrument was sworn to or affirmed before me this 1" day of May, 2006 by Det Joe , who is pers

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida. At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. The parties anticipate that t

EP3toin hereby, stares that he understads the clarifications to the Nort- ProsecutiorrAgraanent and agrees to comply with them. R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITEDSTATES ATTORNEY Dated: Dated: ile Dated: GERALD LEKOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY POR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA01

dyguard. At that point, Epstein stopped walking and began to stare at the victim and ultimately intimidated the Victim Jane Doe #4, in violation of Florida State Statute 914.22. Jane Doe No. 4 was terrified, began crying and ran outside of the building. Epstein smirked at her and walked away. As result of this incide

mate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on standard rules and regulations that apply in the State of Florida- At the United States' request, Epstein agrees to provide an accounting of the gain time he earned during his period of incarceration. 13. "Ile parties anticipate that

dyguard. At that point, Epstein stopped walking and began to stare at the victim and ultimately intimidated the Victim Jane Doe #4, in violation of Florida State Statute 914.22. Jane Doe No. 4 was terrified, began crying and ran outside of the building. Epstein smirked at her and walked away. As result of this incide

erms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida hereby provides you with notice that the United States Attorney has determined, based on reliable evidence, that Jeffrey Epstein has willfully violated one of the conditions of the Non-Prosecution Agreem

vaginal area of MI fourteen year old minor, there is sufficient probable cause to charge him with Lewd and Lascivious Molestation, in violation of Florida State Statute 800.04 (5), a second degree felony. The foregoing-instrument-was-aworn-te-er-affirm before me this 1" day of May, 2006 by Det EM, who is personal