Epstein Secrets

mining when the offense conduct ended, especially when they would almost single-handedly increase the recommended sentencing range by over 10 years. Cl United States v. Cordoba-Murgas, 233 F.3d 704, 708 (2d Cir. 2000) (acknowledging that enhancements based on relevant conduct may result in sentences that are "ex

ad nothing to do with and was not personally responsible for. That result would be fundamentally unjust and contrary to the purposes of sentencing. See United States v. Reuter, 463 F.3d 792, 793 (7th Cir. 2006) 9 EFTA00156349 (Posner, J.) ("A judge might reasonably conclude that a sentence based almost entirel

encing Guidelines (2004) passim passim iii EFTA00156340 Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits this memorandum in support of her objections to the Presentence Investigation Report ("PSR") and her claim that the correct sentencing range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("USSG" or the "Guidelines") is 51-63 months,

s were issued for defendant McDaniel. (Id. at ¶¶ 4, 5.) McDaniel was arrested in Texas and the U.S. Magistrate Judge released McDaniel on bond over the United States' objection. (Id. at ¶ 7.) An emergency motion to revoke bond was prepared and filed with this Court. (Id. at ¶ 8.) The motion was granted by the Hon

of the order of detention, and the United States prepared a response. (Id. at ¶ 9.) In each of its presentations to the courts in Texas and Florida, the United States noted the evidence it had found regarding possible additional victims. (Id. at ¶4 7-9.) The defendant withdrew his motion for review of the detentio

there was no trial. (Id. at ¶¶ 15-17.) Following the change of plea, the Probation Office contacted the United States to obtain material to prepare the Presentence Investigation Report. The Probation Officer was provided access to all of the discovery related to the case, including the 404(b) Notice contained in the Response to th

ing. The Court is at a total loss as to why the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, as well as the Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the above-styled cause, found it appropriate to intentionally withhold the following information from the Court. THE COURT: .

inquiry at sentencing. They are not included in full in any other pleading, were not provided to the United States Probation Officer who prepared the Presentence Investigation Report dated September 1, 2006, and were otherwise absent from the argument of both the Government and Defendant at sentencing. The Court is at a total l