Epstein Secrets

overnment which may be favorable to the defendant on the issues of guilty or punishment within the scope of Brady. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and United Stales, Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976)." See, e.g., Standing Discovery Order, United States' Enriquez, No. 1:10-CR-20488- MGC (July 9, 2010) (doc. #115). These

/21/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANDE DOE #2 I. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION TO USE CORRESPONDENCE TO PROVE VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHT ACT AND TO HAVE THEIR UNREDACTED PLEADI

ners argue that the Court should accept their Statement as true, despite its conclusory allegations and internal inconsistencies, solely because of the United States' failure to stipulate to the Statement. The Court should deny the motion because: (1) Petitioners have misstated that United States' efforts at reach

respond to the victims' motion for a finding of violation of the CVRA is untimely, as that is when the victims must begin drafting reply pleadings. See United States! Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (nth Cir. 1983) (listing factors to be considered in determining whether motion to intervene is timely). CERT

6) ("Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction"); Waytel United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607-08 (1985) (the decision whether to prosecute is "particularly ill-suited to judicial review," and "not readily susceptible to th

ARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Office: (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 By r IM 1 ARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. c 11 iieD 3 BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, Florida 33131 Office: (305 -1-u21 Fax:

minal sentences" to reject mandamus under the Act where a defendant had pleaded guilty and had been sentenced more than two years earlier); see also United States v. Bedonie, 413 F.3d 1126, 1129-30 (10th Cir. 2005) (district court had no authority under mandatory restitution act to reopen restitution proceedin

1 and Jane Doe 2 can have no legitimate particularized need for grand jury materials that they intend to use in violation of the rules of evidence. See United States v. Capozzi, 486 F.3d 711, 727 (1st Cir. 2007) (no right to grand jury transcripts established by defendant who sought them to substantiate an appea

f Intervenors Roy Black and Jay Lefkowitz MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 By /S/ MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. 519480 On Behalf ofIntervenor Martin Weinberg 13 EFTA00205554

age 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs I. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant / INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS ATTENDANCE AT OR PARTICIPATION IN SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Intervenor Jef

ntervenors to participate in settlement negotiations "when those negotiations take place before the Court in a court-ordered settlement conference." United States' Lexington-Fayette Urban Cty. Gov't, 2007 WL 2020246, at *3 (E.D. Ky. July 6, 2007). B. Constitutional Considerations: Recent Court Decisions and

RG, P.C. 14 EFTA00211556 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 385 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 15 of 15 By: Is/ MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. 519480 owlmgw@attnet On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was filed by my off

the long-standing principle that "[t]he Attorney General and United States Attorneys retain broad discretion to enforce the Nation's criminal laws," United States. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996), and that whether to investigate possible criminal conduct, grant immunity, negotiate a plea, or dismiss charge

r No. 0042201 jperczek@ royblack.com On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. By: s/Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. 519480 owlmgw @att.net On behalf of Jeffrey Epstein CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was filed by my of

reement). 5 EFTA00617884 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 207 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2013 Page 6 of 11 from contesting liability.; See also United States' Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 205-6), Exhibit F at 11-12 (detailing reliance of plaintiff

ARTIN G. WEINBERG, ■. 20 Park Plaza Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Office: (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 By: _/s/ MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. 519480 11 EFTA00617890

the long-standing principle that "[t]he Attorney General and United States Attorneys retain broad discretion to enforce the Nation's criminal laws," United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996), and that whether to investigate possible criminal conduct, grant immunity, negotiate a plea, or dismiss char

Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Telephone: (617) 227-3700 EFTA00583387 Fax: (617) 338-9538 By: s/Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. Massachusetts Bar No. 519480 [email protected] On behalf of Jay Epstein CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was filed by my office