Epstein Secrets

) 275 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioners' Reassertion of Objections to Government's Assertions of Privileges by United S f America. Responses due by 11/24/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)() (Entered: 11/07/2014) 276 ORDER granting 275 Motion for Extension of Ti

ompliance re 330 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Seal (dj) (Entered: 07/06/2015) 332 NOTICE of Compliance (Partial) by United Stat f Am ri r 0 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Seal ( ) (Entered: 07/20/2015) 333 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Ti

e 50 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing the . . A rney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence filed by United States of America. ( (Entered: 04/07/2011) 04/07/2011 60 RESPONSE in Opposition re 51 Plaintiff's MOTION Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion to Use Correspondenc

tioners' Motion for Depositions of Government Witnesses re 344 MOTION Motion for Depositions of Government ( ) (Entered: 01/04/2016) Witnesses by United Sta f America. Responses due by 1/22/2016 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) 350 ENDORSED ORDER granting 349 Motion for Extension of Time Re: 34

endant's MOTION for Extension of Time to file Declaration of United States Attorney in Support of Deliberative Process Privilege by United States of Am rica. Responses due by 9/30/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (Entered: 09/13/2013) ENDORSED ORDER granting 236 Motion for Extension of Ti

ION for Extension of Time to certify compliance with Court Order [DE330] re 330 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Seal by United S f Am ri . Responses due by 8/6/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)( ) (Entered: 07/20/2015) 334 ENDORSED ORDER granting 333 Motion for

0795204 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 36 of 1W. Conclusion For the reasons set forth above and in the United States' Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Mailer Jurisdiction, the United States respectfully requests that this Court enter an order dismissing

tution. See In re W.R. Huff, 409 F.3d at 563. The statute pursuant to which Petitioners urge this Court to award restitution, however, does not make the United States liable for restitution for harms caused by others. Therefore, Petitioners are not entitled to restitution in this case. 5. Remaining Relief Request

tfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant Inct -torney Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar N Assistant United S t Attorney Florida Bar No. Attorneys for Respondent 35 EFTA00795205 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Pag

or criminal liability or a waiver of any jurisdictional or other defense as to any person, whether or not her name appears on the list provided by Ste United States. Pursuant to the teams ofthe agreernentand an addendum, to assist you in making such a claim, the U.S. Attorney's Office has asked an independent S

reached (defense counsel has reserved the right to challenge such litigation). 8. The ability to negotiate effectively. Pursuant to this letter, thcUnited States assigns toyou tho responaibilityfor consulting with and selecting the attorney representative for the individuals. The United States and Epstein re

the plea and sentencing, which must occur no later than DeceMber 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United S By: First Assistant ratted States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Ac Anomey AUSA 'This is contingent, however, on being able to provide

ite search is not in question. Courts have long accepted that large quantities of paper documents may be carried off-site for subsequent search. See United States'. Santarelli 778 F.2d 609 (11th Cir. 1985) (holding that agents acted reasonably when they removed documents for examination at another location wher

omputer files are easy to disguise or misname). Furthermore, courts are increasingly recognizing that computer forensics is as much art as science. See United States'. Brooks, 427 F.3d 1246 (10th Cir. 2005) Thus, warrant applications for computer data seeking ownership and control evidence should be drafted in a

material Law enforcement sensitive day period required by Rule 41. R. So United States I. Hernandez, 183 F. Supp.2d 468, ti 480 (D.P. 2002); United S t iies I. Habershaw 2001 WL 1867803, at *8 (D. Mass. May 13, 2001); United States Triumph Capital Grout), Inc. 211 F.R.D. 31, 66 (D. Conn. 2002);

nizations try to overrun sacred Shia sit=s, which could trigger Shia-Sunni conflicts that could be very hard to stamp out." Stepping back, he c=ted the United States' own tortured history in Iraq and the desire not t= let American efforts there go to waste. "We have enormous interests the=e," he added, "and obviou

efugees, a center of inhuman suffering at the hands of a vicious minority regime, a=d a worldwide gathering place for jihadi extremists. First, the United S=ates must establish a serious program to train and equip the rebels. Diplo=acy has failed: the efforts made by the United States in Geneva to reach

do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney EFTA00233096 U.S. Department of Justice United Slates Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: Direct Dial: September 6, 2007

FL 33401 TO: Nathan Z. DershoWitz, Esq. Fax #: ORGANIZATION: Dershowitz, Eiger & Adelson, P.C. SUBJECT: DATE: August 29, 2007 FROM: Assistant United S s Att NUMBER OF PAGES., INCLUDING..TITIIS/P,AG:Ei 3 r.nnAmpnrrs• EFTA00233087 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 50