Epstein Secrets

. Ct. 1980) (finding waiver of "confidentiality of the corpus" of communications from a telephone call disclosing part of privilege communications); United States v. Jacobs, 117 F.3d 82, 90 (2d Cir. 1997) (finding that waiver of attorney-client privilege extended to the entirety of two letters written by Jacob

y News filed a motion to quash, claiming that the tape recording is somehow protected by a journalist's privilege. In June 2010, the District Court (McKenna, J.,) rejected that argument, finding that, in view of its importance. the tape was properly discoverable despite the claim of journalist privilege

recording was somehow protected by a journalist's privilege. Jane Doe responded, and the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) held a hearing and listened to the tape in camera. The district court then ruled that the tape was not protected by the journalist's privilege

761, 2014 WL 5366107 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2014) (Marrero, J.); United States v. Rajaratnam, 753 F. Supp. 2d 317 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (I lolwell, J.); and United Stales v. McClure, No. CRIM.A. 10-028, 2010 WL 3523030 (E.D. La. Sept. 1, 2010)).) The subpoenas found permissible in Yudung Zhu, in particular, sought a

N.Y. 2008) (Scheindlin, J.), as amended (Feb. 20, 2008)—has suggested applying a different standard, and that standard has generally been rejected. See United States v. Bergstein, 16-CR-746 (PKC), 2017 WL 6887596, at '4 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2017) (Castel, J.) ("'iT]he overwhelming majority of district courts in th

missible at defendant's trial on hearsay grounds"); United States v. Jackson, No. 02 CR. 756 (LMM), 2006 WL 1993251, at '2 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2006) (McKenna, J.) ("The defendant has not shown how the subpoenaed telephone records, of their nature hearsay, could be admissible, as required by Nixon."); Bro

applicable statutes of limitations. DISPOSITION: Appeal dismissed. CASE SUMMARY: PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Appellant investors challenged an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York that denied the motion to amend their complaint to add additional plaintiffs after holding that

ed. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 PRIOR HISTORY: rag Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) denying appellants' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add additional plaintiffs, the district court having found that the claims of

applicable statutes of limitations. DISPOSITION: Appeal dismissed. CASE SUMMARY: PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Appellant investors challenged an order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York that denied the motion to amend their complaint to add additional plaintiffs after holding that

d. R. Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 1352 PRIOR HISTORY: r ij Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) denying appellants' motion for leave to amend their complaint to add additional plaintiffs, the district court having found that the claims of

ace .059 photapraPh 3501492.060 MySioce page 3501092.061 Myspace page 3501092.052 Photos of uktims isa .i oace .ora ptotagraphs 3501092.064 United Stales v. inactrnent 3501092.066 200503.15 Amigo f Ile (full taparecordAt side Al 3501492466 2005.03.15 Sono f de (dip of tape wording! 3501492.067

Monism/ 302 3501.142-01 2020.0x15 nternew notes 3501.10-01 2019.11.01 Intones" 301 3501.10-000 2019.11.01 Intoning Notes 3501.148 eatrkk McKenna DM Dosciptkes 39)1 148 0)1 2006.11.11 Florida DAVID. indnidual summary page for Patoct McKenna 3501148 032 2006.11.11 Florida DAY.I.D.IndhIdu

s. — 10:00 AM — Host: Committee on Small Business • Hearing: Legislative Presentation of The American Legion Multi VSOs: Jewish War Veterans of the U.S.A Minority Veterans of America National Association of County Veterans Services Officers Military Officers Association of America National Associatio

ht to help fund Mexican cartels. EFTA01655692 Karen Read Case: Defense Confirms It Paid Crash Experts Hired by FBI After Trial Mass Live (02/25, McKenna) reported that at a hearing on Tuesday, defense lawyers for Karen Read sought to downplay the extent of the communications they had with a pair of a

as informed I am receiving it. I can expand at length on the accolades and praise I have received from Agents, Analysts, management, HQ, Assistant United States Attorney's (AUSA's), local law enforcement, and more over the years. Even despite my current situation I continue to receive praise and support fro

he ECU to find a way to pitch the idea. I reached out to Supervisory Administrative Specialist (SAS) Arlene McKenna, who oversees the NYFO ECU. SAS McKenna also liked my idea and stated any changes in the evidence Page 39 of 106 IINCLASSIFIED//FOII0 EFTA00173411 UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO 01/26/2024 New