Epstein Secrets

e less than $5,000,000.00; 10. That this Court has jurisdiction over said assets as they originated in the United States; That the treaties between the United Stales and the Cayman Islands and related governments clearly establishes the right of the United Slates to seize such assets. That counsel for MORSE has

d to as RRA) was a legal entity organized under the laws of the State of Florida and constituted an Enterprise as that term is defined in Title 18, United States Cod; Section 1961(4). The Enterprise engaged in, and the activities of which affected, interstate and foreign commerce. THE RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY 3.

t of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 and I957, that is: i. to knowing

d in the United States; That the treaties between the United Stales and the Cayman Islands and related governments clearly establishes the right of the United Slates to seize such assets. That counsel for MORSE has facilitated the contact between the relative governments and as a Page 2 of 6 EFTA00223350 resu

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied In a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00223353 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may bo enforced in either venue; and 29

as a Page 2 of 6 EFTA00795670 result,. this Court has received clear and convincing evidence that such funds will be immediately transferred to the United Stales: 12. That the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to immediately submit the proper A documentation to the appropriate bank of the Cayman Islands to

of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, /SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, 1,1eZNIK did knowingly conspi federate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Atto mmit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code1S 1956 and 1957, that is: i. to knowingly conduct and a

ation of Title 18, United States Code, Selo 34 and 1343, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957. All in violation of Title 18, United Sta ection I 956(h). (Mail and Wi ud C nspiracy, 18 U.S.C. §1349) 1. The General All d paragraphs 5 through 40 of Count I of the Information are r

hat all deadlines in this Order arc satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 016 EFTA00795673 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

se originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to September 1, 2O07? — Yes _X_ No CO lo ASSISTA T UNITED STA ES ATTORNEY Flo Ida Bar No. A005500030 EFTA00193885 Case 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 36 of 36 UNITED STATE

erms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida hereby provides you with notice that the United States Attorney has determined, based on reliable evidence, that Jeffrey Epstein has willfully violated one of the conditions of the Non-Prosecution Agreem

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied In a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00193900 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

e months before trial, Epstein filed the underlying Motion to Continue and indicated that he would be moving to stay these proceedings until Doe v. United States is resolved. Thus, after assuming the burden of proof for three years, Epstein now claims that he cannot defend this case and will "be forced

tes case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April 12, 2011, wherein he acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Mr. Edwards only days before a scheduled

e months before trial, Epstein filed the underlying Motion to Continue and indicated that he would be moving to stay these proceedings until Doe v. United States is resolved. Thus, after assuming the burden of proof for three years, Epstein now claims that he cannot defend this case and will "be force

tes case in paragraph 29(4) of his Amended Complaint filed on April 12, 2011, wherein he acknowledged that one of the potential outcomes of Doe was the Federal Court "invalidating the [Non-Prosecution] Agreement." In 2012, Epstein voluntarily dismissed his claims against Mr. Edwards only days before a scheduled

has changed tactics and asserted a new position: he cannot defend the malicious prosecution claims at the upcoming trial because of the 2008 Doe v. United States proceeding, which was filed before Epstein initiated this litigation. If that is true, how did Epstein intend to prove his claims against Mr. Edward

vernment's response to the Doe petition, confirming her belief that Epstein's non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") should be declared illegal and that the Federal Court should "direct the Government to proceed to negotiate a new agreement — in a process that respects Petitioner's (and the other victims') rights."'

t of Florida and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with persons known and unknown to the United States Attorney, to commit offenses against the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956 and 1957, that is: i. to knowing

at all deadlines in this Order are satisfied in a timely fashion, subject to further order of this Court; Page 5 of 6 EFTA00729489 28. That both the Federal Court of the Southern District of Florida and this Court have concurrent jurisdiction over these matters and same may be enforced in either venue; and 29

whistle-blowing concept to adversaries was echoed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. He complimented Snowden for having “uncovered illegal acts by the United States around the globe,” Putin’s view implies a convenient global concept of whistle-blowing that justified breaking US laws. Even so, this whistle-blower

amily was employed by the Federal government. His father Lon in 2006 was serving in the Coastguard; his mother Wendy was the administrative clerk for the Federal Court in Maryland; his sister Jessica was a research director at the Federal Judicial Center; and his namesake grandfather, Admiral Barrett, was still a to