Epstein Secrets

eceipt of this letter by returning a signed copy to me. If you have any questions about it, please call me at B : Sincerely, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA TANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY I acknowledge that I have read this letter and understand it Date: 0 ifielao0 Signature: EFTA00178684 U.S. Departns of Justice Unite

45(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2."Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United • States or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of cert

Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2."Fees and mileage need not be tendered to the witness upon service of a subpoena issued on behalf of the United States or an officer or agency thereof (Rule 45(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 17(d), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure) or on behalf of cert

court or by an officer acting on behalf of the court. CLERK (BY) DEPUTY CLERK DATE: June 27, 2007 This subpoena is issued upon application of the United Slates of America hone Number of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Marie C. VillafaBa, Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 So. Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach FL 33

federal criminal law. Grand Jury proceedings are secret. Unauthorized disclosure of matters occurring before the grand jury is a violation of Fed. IL Crim. P 6(e), and may be punished as a contempt of court. I request that you acknowledge receipt of this letter by returning a signed copy to me. If you

3/21/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johason JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION TO HAVE THEIR FACTS ACCEPTED BECAUSE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S FAILURE TO CONTEST ANY OF THE FACTS COME NOW Jane Do

11 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' MOTION TO USE CORRESPONDENCE TO PROVE VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND TO HAV

ners argue that the Court should accept their Statement as true, despite its conclusory allegations and internal inconsistencies, solely because of the United States' failure to stipulate to the Statement. The Court should deny the motion because: (1) Petitioners have misstated that United States' efforts at reach

230762 1 tvo", 77.—•-•— . • . i Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 3 of 10 before the grand jury." Fed. IL Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Furthermore, court hearings and court records and orders must be sealed "to the extent and as long as necessary to prevent the unaut

ntalities of the Subject Offenses This warrant authorizes the seizure of certain evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Cod; Sections 1591 (Sex Trafficking of Knots), and 371 (Sex Trafficking Conspiracy) (the "Subject Offenses") described as follows: 1. Any documents or

believe that there is probable cause to believe that the Subject Device contains evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591 (sex trafficking of minors), and 371 (sex trafficking conspiracy) (the "Subject Offenses"). The Target Subjects of this investig

ealed (identift the person or describe the property to be seized): See Attached Affidavit and its Attachment A The basis for the search under Fed. IL Crim. P. 41(c) is (check one or more): X 0 evidence of a crime; Cl contraband, fruits of crime, or other items illegally possessed; O property designed

ners argue that the Court should accept their Statement as true, despite its conclusory allegations and internal inconsistencies, solely because of the United States' failure to stipulate to the Statement. The Court should deny the motion because: (1) Petitioners have misstated that United States' efforts at reach

230184 1 tvo", 77.—•-•— . • . i Case 9:08-cv-60736-KAM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 3 of 10 before the grand jury." Fed. IL Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Furthermore, court hearings and court records and orders must be sealed "to the extent and as long as necessary to prevent the unaut